decemberthirty: (matisse)
I finished Creative Writing and Rewriting a few days ago. I'm not exactly sure when -- I've fallen down on the job of keeping this journal up to date. The book became a bit of a forced march toward the end, but I think I'm glad I read it. Kuehl's project is a worthwhile one, and the book could be very valuable in a different context. It's the sort of thing that should be studied with a class, or else should sit on the shelf as a reference to be pulled out when dealing with questions of revision. Unfortunately, the copy I read is not my own and must be given back to the friend who loaned it to me, which forced me to read it cover to cover, perhaps the least productive way of using this particular book. Oh well.

And now I've started East of Eden, the next selection for my book club. I've only read about 20 of its 600 pages, but I like it. Steinbeck's prose is straightforward and strong, and I like the narrator's voice. I know almost nothing about the book, which is an interesting situation; I almost never read a book without having at least a basic sense of what it's about.

Also, John Updike is a remarkable writer. His story "My Father's Tears" made me cry this morning. And, sure, I've been a weepy girl lately, and the story touched on many of the things that have been making me weepy (getting older, and memory, and history, connection, relationships that fail and those that don't...), but still. It was all so subtly done, the story tinged with just a hint of quiet sadness...ah, lovely!
decemberthirty: (adkguideboat)
I have finally finished Trust Me. All in all, I found it less compelling than the novels of Updike's that I've read. Still, there was a power in the way the stories piled up, one after another after another. A big snowdrift of stories, of characters, of lives. In a way, reading Updike is almost an absolving experience. Whatever mistakes you have made in your life and your relationships--whether you've ended up with the wrong person or can't be satisfied with the right person, whether you regret your infidelities or regret missed opportunities for infidelity, whether you've fallen in love with someone off limits or fallen out of love with your spouse, whether you ended it too early or let it drag on far too long--you can find yourself reflected in Updike. The stories read like a parade of human fallibility, and the cumulative effect is one of great tenderness toward all these poor, fucked up people who keep on making the same mistakes you do.
decemberthirty: (egret)
A lovely Sunday morning. I had a nice breakfast with my out-of-town friend before she headed off for her conference and I now I'm sitting at my big wooden table with a good cup of tea, good music on the stereo, and sunlight coming in through the curtain. Ms. E is out buying the New York Times, and in a few minutes I'll be working on the book. It's cold enough that I'm wearing my favorite grey turtleneck sweater. I'm feeling very content right now.

I finished Life of Pi a few days ago. As predicted, I remain unimpressed. I don't know. I didn't hate the book by any stretch: it was a good story, stylistically impressive, and I love tigers, so I enjoyed getting to find out all sorts of interesting things about them. I just didn't find it to be the sort of life-altering reading experience that people have made it out to be. Very early on in the book, Yann Martel claims that it is "a story to make you believe in God," a bold statement from any author, and certainly not one that came true in my case. Perhaps my lack of appreciation for the book is connected to the fact that I am the least religious person I've ever met. I just don't have an ounce of spiritual feeling in my body; with me it's not really a question of whether or not I believe in God, because I just don't really care enough to spend time wondering about it. So that might explain some of why I failed to get it. I also didn't like the ending. I thought Martel pulled the rug out from under his own story and reduced it all to an exercise in point-proving that just made the book smaller than it could have been.

Now I'm reading Trust Me, a book of short stories by John Updike. What a writer. I've only read three or four of the stories, but that's enough to remind me once again what a genius Updike is. He has such an amazing ability to capture scenes, feelings, states of mind with just a single perfect turn of phrase. His subject matter is not always terribly appealing to me, and some of his social observances are now rather dated, but his astonishing talent means that he is always worth reading. And while I'm on the subject of Updike, I read a really wonderful story of his in The New Yorker a few weeks ago. (I'm way behind on my New Yorkers--if I read it a few weeks ago, it probably ran sometime in mid-August.) The story was called "Elsie By Starlight" and it was a gorgeous and spot-on reminiscence of teenager-hood, burgeoning sexuality, first experiences... A really excellent story, the best short story I've read in quite a while. Find it and read it if you get the chance.

In non-literary news, I saw Stage Beauty last night, and it was great movie. At times funny, sexy, theatrical, and intense, it was very well written and well acted, particularly by Billy Crudup. Highly recommended. And it gave me some interesting stuff to think about for the next book, but I'm not allowed to think about that yet, because I get too excited and want to start working on that instead of the book I should be working on...

Also, I have a beautiful butternut squash sitting in my kitchen and I'm going to use it tonight to make my winter vegetable minestrone. Good warm food on a chilly fall day. It doesn't get much better than that.
decemberthirty: (Default)
I just finished The Centaur. I feel that there was a lot that I missed in the book, a lot that went over my head, but I found it very beautiful nonetheless. I have a pretty good general familiarity with Greek and Roman mythology (I ought to, after Ulysses and six years of Latin and all the time I spent reading D'aulaire's Greek Myths as a kid), but I wish I were more familiar with the myth of Chiron. I did not realize as I was reading how thoroughly the mythical correspondences are woven into the book; it was only when I finished and saw the index at the end that I realized that every single character in the book has a mythical referent. I already knew that Caldwell, Peter's father, represents the centaur Chiron, and I have now learned that Chiron gave his life to atone for the sin of the theft of fire by Prometheus, represented by Peter. But there is a whole host of other characters, all of whom play a part in Updike's distorted, modernized retelling of the myth, and although I can get a few of the obvious ones (Zimmerman is Zeus, for instance), I don't know enough to place them all and I wish I did. Just knowing the bit about Prometheus and the theft of fire makes the end of the book much more moving...

It's interesting that both Joyce and Updike wrote books that are essentially about father-son relationships, but that both clouded and complicated their stories with the same sort of heavy referentiality to the same source material. It is perhaps possible to grasp the messages of these books without considering the myths through which the stories are filtered, but your understanding of the relationships described will be much richer if you can make the mythological connections. I don't really know where this I am going with this comparison, but I do think it's interesting.

Mythology aside, The Centaur was sometimes baffling and not particularly gripping (I was capable of putting it down for long stretches at a time without feeling compelled to pick it back up), but it had a strange kind of loveliness to it. The prose was dense and rich, and sometimes it was enough to let the flood of words pour over me, and at other times the simplest words and phrases combined to have a remarkably gorgeous effect. This paragraph near the end, as Peter watches his father leave their snowbound house, is particularly lovely:

I turned my face away and looked through the window. In time my father appeared in this window, an erect figure dark against the snow. His posture made no concession to the pull underfoot; upright he waded out through our yard and past the mailbox and up the hill until he was lost to my sight behind the trees of our orchard. The trees took white on their sun side. The two telephone wires diagonally cut the blank blue of the sky. The stone wall was a scumble of umber; my father's footsteps thumbs of white in white. I knew what this scene was--a patch of Pennsylvania in 1947--and yet I did not know, was in my softly fevered state mindlessly soaked in a rectangle of colored light. I burned to paint it, just like that, in its puzzle of glory; it came upon me that I must go to Nature disarmed of perspective and stretch myself like a large transparent canvas upon her in the hope that, my submission being perfect, the imprint of a beautiful and useful truth would be taken.

Perhaps you have to have read the whole book leading up to that paragraph in order to get something out of it. I don't know. You could perhaps pinpoint the moment at which Peter/Prometheus steals the life-giving fire to that paragraph, and to me it is moving and luminous.
decemberthirty: (Default)
I'm still reading The Centaur. I'm enjoying it, but progress is slow. Reading it is like wading through vast snowdrifts of prose--I'm trying to maintain forward motion, but I'm hip-deep in words. The writing is, for the most part, beautiful, but extremely dense. It's interesting that the last time I wrote about the book I made a rather flippant, off-hand comparison with Ulysses, because the more I think about it, the more similarities I notice. The Centaur is much shorter and Updike's style is not nearly as willfully obscure as Joyce's, but both books are based on Greek myths (Is the Odyssey a myth? Not exactly, but the word will serve my purpose.), both books use those myths to demonstrate the differences between our debauched modern age and the heroic age represented in the myths, both books feature an intelligent but isolated antihero, both books focus on the interior life of the characters, both books follow their protagonists through a fairly ordinary day in their lives (The Centaur has spanned two days so far, but that's close enough)... It seems to me that there are enough similarities that it couldn't possibly be incidental. Did Updike intend to write an American Ulysses? If that was his goal, it's certainly an ambitious one!

Noticing all of these similarities has had an interesting effect on my reading of the book. On the one hand, I feel that it has helped me get a better handle on what's going on in the book. On the other, I am somewhat afraid that I am allowing Ulysses to color my interpretation of The Centaur more than I should. A good example of this is the confusion I was having over the significance of the the myth of Chiron in the book. Last time I posted about the book, I couldn't figure out why the centaur appeared or what he had to do with the narrative. Now, however, I just say, "Oh, it's just like in Ulysses! The myth is there to highlight the disparities between the modern and classical worlds." This may very well be true, but it's also possible that Updike is trying to say something entirely different. The Centaur is its own book, after all, and I should allow it to be.

In other news, I went through a phase where I posted about interesting things I cooked, and I think I might revive that idea. I've been writing a lot about my reading and my writing, so I might as well include my third hobby. Anyhow, last night I made a great dish with orzo, zucchini, tomato, roasted peppers, and a bunch of other stuff. It was great, very summery and fresh. Plus, all the herbs I used were homegrown, so that was cool. I love being able to just go up onto the deck and cut some herbs, take them down to the kitchen, wash them and throw them in the pot.

In yet more news, I am not on a good pace to meet the deadline I have set for finishing the revision of the next chapter of my book. I'm having a hard time figuring out how to begin one particular scene, and it's really holding me up. Must get my act together!
decemberthirty: (Default)
I am still reading The Centaur. It's an interesting book, and I'm not entirely sure what to make of it yet. There does not appear to be any sort conflict in the book at this point. Well, that's not entirely accurate; there's plenty of conflict, but it's all just the momentary frictions and chronic annoyances of everyday family and working life, not the sort of thing that really drives a plot. In a way it's reminiscent of Ulysses, if Ulysses were set in a small town in central Pennsylvania. Lots of wandering around, lots of attention to the inner life of the characters... Stylistically, though, it's actually very different from Ulysses. Anyhow, despite it's lack of any driving conflict, I'm finding myself really wrapped up in it. Updike has done such a wonderful job of creating the character of Peter: prickly, proud, sensitive, aloof, and very very real. He's part of the reason I'm drawn to the book, but I'm also interested because there's a lot that I haven't figured out yet. The chapters told from Peter's point of view are basically realistic, but the chapters told from his father's perspective are more problematic. The events described stretch the limits of belief (a group of high school students shoot an arrow through their teacher's ankle; the teacher leaves the school and goes to the garage next door where he has a mechanic cut out the arrow; he then returns to the school and continues teaching his class--am I supposed to believe that really happened? To take it seriously? And if not, how am I supposed to take it?), and the narrative switches back and forth between the at-least-semi-realistic high school setting and basically the same story being told through Greek mythology, with Chiron the centaur representing Peter's father. When I was reading the first chapter, I was absolutely mystified. I thought the father actually was a centaur who had somehow wound up teaching science in a high school in PA, or perhaps that the book was set in some crazy world where the Greek myths and ordinary life somehow exist simultaneously and overlap... So, yeah, it's kind of crazy, and I definitely don't have a handle on all of it yet, so I keep reading in an attempt to figure it out.

In other news, today there was a "suspicious package" at the mall where I work. It was big excitement, cops and bomb squad guys all over the place. And the package was right outside my office, too! I could see it from my desk! Of course I didn't notice until all the action started... (good thing I'm not on the bomb squad, I guess). The end result of all this was that I got to close up and go home early. Very nice. A few phone calls to the students who were going to be coming in, and next thing I knew, I had myself a free evening. So I went to see the Cole Porter movie, De-Lovely. It was good, and Kevin Kline did a great job, but it was not nearly as homoerotic as I had been led to believe. Scads of gorgeous gay guys of the sort of intensely closeted, WASP-y, tuxedo-wearing, late-40's/early-50's, gay underworld type, though.

And now, I must go work on the novel. The deadline for completing the revision of the next chapter (it's one of the many 2003 chapters, so let's call it the Friday Night chapter. Or, since I just read the first draft of it, I suppose we could call it the Poorly Structured, Incredibly Stilted Dialogue, Half This Stuff Doesn't Even Make Sense chapter, although I'd rather not.) is Monday, July 26. That gives me two full weekend, plus all of next week.
decemberthirty: (Default)
I finished Summerland last night. What a great read. Just pure fun from start to finish. Chabon's writing was great, as always, and it was interesting to see him try something so different from his other books. He did an amazing job with his young characters. They really seemed to think and talk like kids. I'm always impressed by that kind of thing, because it's something that I struggle with a lot in my own writing. That child-voice does not come very naturally to me. I also liked the book because, while it is certainly in the tradition of other young adult fantasy works (the quest, the motley band of characters, the battle between good and evil...), it's a lot more lighthearted than things like Susan Cooper's The Dark Is Rising, Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials, or LeGuin's Earthsea books. This is not to say that Summerland is better than those other books; I just liked the way Chabon took the same elements as those authors and, by using a totally different tone, created a book that feels very different. I don't think I'm doing a very good job of explaining myself.

Comparing Summerland to other books in its genre made my realize that it's once again getting to be time to read the Earthsea books, but I wanted to read something for adults before I dove right into it. So I started The Centaur by John Updike. I haven't read a whole lot of Updike beyond the Rabbit series and various short stories, but I thought the Rabbit books were really phenomenal and have been meaning to read more of him for some time. The Centaur was selected rather at random, just because I happened to find it in used bookstore a month or so ago. I am not really far enough along at this point to say much about it, aside from the fact that I find it strangely entrancing...
decemberthirty: (full crane)
I'm almost done with -Rabbit is Rich-. And I really don't know what to read next.

And I don't have a whole lot to say. I'm ready for this week to be over. I've been sluggish and lazy. I love my job, which makes me not love myself when I'm not doing my job. So bring on next week, a fresh start! And it's a short week, so it should be easy to keep any productivity related resolutions.
decemberthirty: (crane face)
I'm still working on -Rabbit is Rich-, and I'm enjoying it much more than I enjoyed either of the previous books in the series. At this point, I'm talking strictly about the degree to which I'm engrossed in the story. I really haven't read enough yet to make statements about the quality of the book as a whole.
decemberthirty: (Default)
I haven't been able to update lately because I only have internet access at work, and I've been taking on more responsibility recently so my days have been very full. I love it, however, so I may have to be content with updating with less frequency.

Anyhow, I finished Graham Swift's -Ever After-, which I enjoyed very much. I didn't knock my socks off with it's brilliance the way -Waterland- did, but I think that's because it was more understated, not less brilliant. Swift really does an amazing job of capturing his narrators. Also of bringing about a thousand different topics into his novels. There's no possible way I could give a coherent summary of -Ever After-; it deals with marriage, technology, suicide, Darwinism, adultery, the spiritual crisis of the Victorians, geology, family, revenge, academia, religion, surveying, ambition, fame, Hamlet... It's good.

And now I've started -Rabbit is Rich-, the third book in John Updike's Rabbit series. Anyone who has been reading at all faithfully knows that I have had fairly ambivalent feelings about the first two books in the series, so we'll see how I feel about this one. One interesting thing about embarking on the third book, however, is that I am beginning to have an appreciation for the impressive nature of the series as a whole. Updike has really done a good job of portraying the ways in which Rabbit is changed by the times he lives in. It provides a series of very interesting and detailed snapshots of certain American cultural moments...

In other reading news, E. gave me a copy of Ursula K. LeGuin's most recent book, which is an extension of her Earthsea series. I'm just not sure if I want to read it. In my opinion, that series is so perfect the way it is, and I'm afraid that there's no possible way she could continue it without somehow marring the perfection that already exists... If anyone has read it, please let me know.
decemberthirty: (Default)
Finished -Rabbit Redux-. Strangely, I feel like it was a better book than -Rabbit, Run-, although I enjoyed the experience of reading -Rabbit, Run- much more than I enjoyed -Rabbit Redux-. I sure did like the last paragraph, however.

I didn't really have anything on hand to read next, so I borrowed a book from my roommate; -The Last Time I Wore a Dress- by Daphne Scholinski. It's a memoir about her experiences as a young woman being treated in various mental institutions for what was deemed "inappropriate" gender expression. She was severely depressed, had been physically and sexually abused, but the doctors were more concerned about the fact that she didn't wear makeup, and preferred ratty jeans and heavy metal t-shirts to more "appropriately feminine" clothes. It was an interesting book, and a very quick read. Not high literature, but valuable nonetheless. I found Scholinski to be a much more sympathetic narrator than the authors of other mental illness memoirs that I have read, such a -Girl, Interrupted-.

And now I've started -The Porcupines- by Julian Barnes. I read Barnes's -History of the Worlds in 10 1/2 Chapters- for a class a few years ago and really liked it, so I'm optimistic about this one. I've only read about five pages, however, so it's a little too soon to comment.
decemberthirty: (Default)
After writing what I wrote yesterday, I read several hundred pages of -Rabbit Redux- and encountered some very unpleasant images of drug use. Timely, hunh?

My feelings are mixed about -Rabbit Redux-. I continue to read it mainly out of a horrified fascination, just to find out exactly how far Rabbit will allow his life to spin out of control. I'm not really enjoying the experience, however.

Phew. And I don't enjoy my Fridays either. Ten hours without a break. The things you'll do when you love your job....
decemberthirty: (Default)
I finished -Sometimes a Great Notion- a few days ago, and the only thing I have to say is "read it." Everyone read it. It's amazing, and that's all there is to it.

I'm currently reading -Rabbit Redux-. Updike's sequel to -Rabbit, Run-. I haven't really read enough to form much of an opinion yet, so I won't say too much here. It's well-written, as is all Updike, but so far the characters and their petty little lives feel sort of dirty to me. No one is as sympathetic as they were the first time around.
decemberthirty: (Default)
So is it safe to go back to simply reading and writing about what I read again? It seems hard to know how and when to resume real life...

But, putting that aside and stoically resolving to resume real life, I will continue. I finished -Rabbit, Run- which I believe was the last book I mentioned in this journal. It was a very well-crafted book. The protagonist (I was going to call him the hero, but anyone who has read the book will realize that he's much more of an anti-hero than he is a hero) spends most of the book feeling unnerved and at loose ends, and Updike was able to create a situation in which I wound up feeling ill at ease myself while reading the book. I'd be sitting on the train reading on my way home, and only be able to read a few pages at a time because I felt so unsettled. I'm very anxious to go on to the rest of the series.

Not having any of the other Rabbit books to hand, however, I'm currently reading Ken Kesey's -Sometimes a Great Notion-. I'm only about 100 pages in, but I have most definitely been grabbed. So far I have found that Kesey's style is far more sophisticated and interesting in this book than in -One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest-. He has written quite a tangled family story, and narrates the story in an equally tangled style, with plot lines constantly crossing and interweaving, the past and future endlessly overlapping... In some sort of strange way it reminds me a little of -The Sound and the Fury-.
decemberthirty: (Default)
I don't know how feasible it's going to be for me to continue this journal. I've just started a new job where I don't have the constant internet access that I used to have. It's my dream job, however, so that makes up for it... I don't know yet whether or not I'm quitting for good. Maybe I can work something out from home... We'll see.

But because I don't want to leave you all hanging, oh my adoring multitudes, I'll fill in a little of what I've been reading since I last updated. I finished the Earthsea series and of course loved it, and felt my soul expanded from the experience of reading those books once again. I think it's about time that Maureen read that series.

After that I read -Catch 22- by Joseph Heller. I found it to be decent, although not engrossing. All in all, it's a little bit dated. Worth reading, probably, but I certainly didn't find it earth-shattering. Also, none of the characters really grabbed me. I find that I really need good characters to maintain my interest in a book, and that was certainly lacking here.

After -Catch 22-, I read -Napolean Symphony- by Anthony Burgess. A true tour de force by a true genius. I have loved all of Burgess's fictional biographies, and this one is no exception. It is amazingly researched, excellently written, and, in contrast with -Catch 22-, features brilliantly drawn characters. Burgess does an amazing job of capturing Napolean himself, humanizing him and exposing the real complexity of his nature. It's a difficult read, and not for the faint of heart, but I recommend it highly for those who are willing to do the work.

I am currently in the middle of John Updike's -Rabbit, Run-, which I am enjoying. I haven't read too much Updike, but he seems to be quite a linguistic craftsman. This is another book that is showing its age a little bit, but it seems to have held up somewhat better than -Catch 22-. It does an excellent job of portraying the stifling suburban lifestyle of the mid-sixties.

And that's about all... I don't know when I'll return, if I do at all.
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 09:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »